December 23, 2024 - The History of New Zealand through a Libertarian Anarchist lens. Please enjoy the ideas and let me know what you think.

1864: The Old Man of Rangiaohia

July 26, 2022

By AHNZ

Old Man of Rangiaohia is a story that could be made into an exciting action drama. Check out some of these quotes:

“This is not someone to underestimate..”

“Any more you send to me, I’m sending back in bags. Any one you send to my kid, I’m sending back in pieces.”

“You have no idea what I did, who I was…

“There’s a villian in every story. Nobody ever sees themselves as playing that role.”

“There’s no limit to the damage he’ll do. Or the things he’ll destroy.”

“It’s what I’m built for. Defending things.”

These are, in fact, quotes from the trailer of the new streaming show Old Man (2022) as is the image (left.) Ref. trailer

These lines could just as well apply to a tall old Maori man, clothed in a white blanket, named Hoani Papita. He made his last stand at Rangiaohia. This was a supply village to the Kingite Maori who had invaded Auckland and started the Waikato War and it was swiftly being deconstructed by General Duncan Cameron and his men. The operation went very well, most Maoris surrendering peacefully and being treated well. Hoani was one of the few hold-outs. When officers came he decided to go down swinging.

“I heard my father say to my grandfather:  ‘Let us lay down our guns and give ourselves up as prisoners.’ My grandfater said: ‘Am I greater than your uncles who were taken at Rangiriri? My father again said to my grandfather: ‘Let us go in peace and according to law.’ My grandfather would not agree..” – Evening Star (1883,) Papers Past 

“At this point, Captain Wilson ordered Sergeant McHale, the sole Australian volunteer in the cavalry, to enter the hut and take the occupants prisoner. Potatau again: ‘The European went inside of the house.  My grandfather shot him and killed him. Some of the others dragged the body in the house.  At this time my mother and self arose and went through the soldiers and between the troopers.  They did not interfere with us, but allowed us to pass.” – What happened at Rangiaowhia in 1864? John Robinson (2017)

“But these last hold-outs put up a very brave fight, refusing to surrender their combustible thatched fortress. They keep shooting back at the overwhelming Imperial forces surrounding. A Cavalryman, a soldier, a Colonel, a Corporal, a Ranger- all killed by the hold-outs!” – 1864: Rangiaohia, AHNZ

“Boy, if ever there was an engagement that the Maori feel bitter about it is this one. Marmaduke Nixon was beloved of his troops. His being shot from the resisting whare who had been offered surrender would have resulted in only one outcome for those inside. Especially when further troopers were shot. There is a video on youtube of the commemoration of the plaque marking this event. It has the NZ Army, politicians and academics in obedient attendance all infused with solemn guilt. The plaque reads ‘This stone is a memorial to the atrocities suffered by Ngati Apakura, Ngati Hinetu and others at Rangiaowhia on the 21st of February, 1864’ Atrocities!, what a joke, you have to get into the history of what Te Kooti did to know what atrocities really were.” – Comment to AHNZ

“Rangiaoawhi wasn’t ‘unfortified’ or ‘undefened’ every single person in the village was armed. The floors of the whares were 3′ below ground level…(why would you do that in the soggy old waikato? If it was going to fill up with water.? …except for defence.?” – Comment to AHNZ

“The Church which was allegedly set on fire, burning women and. Children inside, strangely was able to appear in photographs some years after.” – Comment to AHNZ

A “war crime….And I use those two words deliberately. We remember the massacre in Christchurch but Rangiaowhia doesn’t seem to be part of the national conscience…Speaking later in the morning, Roa said he was hopeful the Crown and politicians would begin speaking to Ngati Apakura about the possibility of a reconciliation package.” – Reconciliation called to officially recognise ‘war crime’ at Rangiaowhia, Stuff (2020)

Grandfather Papita had come to the house of his son for a last stand but found that his family didn’t want to die that way. They surrendered with the rest of the settlement and their lives were saved.  Sergeant McHale, an Australian who spoke Maori, conveyed the Papitas away and was shot dead by Papita Snr for it. This is according to Potatau Papita’s eye-witness account from having been in the house when his grandfather started his attack.

Cavalry Captain Wilson was the next officer to offer a kind hand to Grandpa Papita and at once stopped the soldiers from returning fire. “What are you shooting the Maoris for?” he said, jumping from his horse and entering the hut. He soon discovered what and backed out before he could be blasted too. Before it was over the Old Man and his helpers took down many more.  A soldier of the 65th also died in front of the hut. Colonel Nixon himself was the next to go, shot through the lungs while firing his pistol through the doorway. Corporal Alexander was shot through the throat from out of the darkness before he could discharge his carbine. Von Tempsky emptied his pistol in the direction from where the fatal shot had come and the Rangers dragged Alexander’s body away.

The hut was shot up and caught fire but the Old Man, the last survivor, was still not dead. Out of the blazing hut he came he came. According to the historian James Cowan the Old Man emerged from the doorway with arms outstretched, unarmed. “Spare him, spare him!’ shouted the nearest officers. But next moment there was a thunder of shots. … the old hero  … swayed slowly and fell dead to the ground.  The episode enraged the chivalrous officers who had entreated quarter for him.

If those officers were enraged by the Old Man being killed in hot blood how much more upset would they be to know how this story would be revised in the 2010s? In our current ‘Aotearoa New Zealand’ era the story has been given a new spin of “brutality” and “genocide.”

  • 2014 The State plants a memorial marker at Rangiaohia to the “atrocities” (see image)
  • 2016 Vincent O’Malley repeats the story in his book offering little or no evidence. Ref. 1864: Rangiaohia, AHNZ

My opinion is that Old Man Hoani Papita was no sympathetic case as modern Victimhood Culture would wish to make him for their own gains. Government “reconciliation packages” rely upon victimisation real or imagined. This is a denigration of Hoani’s Last Stand. An Honour Culture man who was probably older than the Musket Wars and would have been fighting on the lines if he were a younger man like his sons. Too proud to be herded with the women and children peasants, he was a warrior and insisted on dying a warrior’s death in a blaze of glory and not going quietly. Revisionist historians, for their own self-serving ends, rob him of that and loot our history.

Vincent O’Malley Discovers New Source

Hey, a new “primary source” has emerged about the alleged Rangiaowhia torching via Vincent O’Malley? This should be good…

“Vincent O’Malley takes us even closer to the events of 1845–1872, through the first-hand accounts from Māori and Pākehā who either fought or witnessed the New Zealand Wars.” – A survivor’s account of the torching of Rangiaowhia, e-tangata.co.nz (2021)

Let’s see this “first-hand” account…

“A remarkable unpublished letter to the editor of the Waikato Times from 1991…written by a local Pākehā man,…the recollection of an unnamed Māori woman….given to her…by an eyewitness, then a girl of about ten.” ibid

Unknown traumatised ten-year-old sees through the fog of war to what really happened, tells another unnamed woman who, in turn, tells another unnamed woman. The telling is then passed on to someone named Piri in 1936 who then passed the information to a Pakeha named Mac Burt.

I don’t know Vince, doesn’t sound too ‘first hand’ or ‘remarkable’ or ‘authentic’ at all!

“…the level of detail it provides gives it a ring of authenticity and it appears to be a genuine attempt to convey what its author had heard or read.”

It’s history spin like this that turns straw into gold and O’Malley into an eminent New Zealand Government historian in the 2020s Aotearoa New Zealand era.

If, on the other hand, a different author exercises the right of reply they get pounded upon…

“It’s making a lie of my nan, its making a lie of my mum… what I’d like to happen to that book, is for it to be taken off the shelves,” she said.” –New book says brutal attack in NZ Land Wars never occurred, One News (July 2022)

We erect new revisionists markers and defend on national television the mythical history of “brutal” “genocide.” Meanwhile, our true history monuments that have been around for generations are toppled and denigrated. For example, see O’Malley’s fellow Difficult Histories team mate Liana MacDonald trying to oust the monument to Boulcott’s Farm Raid. Ref. 1846: Boulcott’s Farm Raid, AHNZ


Image ref. Battle. Colourised a bit by AHNZ 2019; Alexander Turnbull Library; NZ History.gov

Image ref. Monument to nothing, AHNZ Archives (April 2022)

Note: The ‘Atrocity of Rangiaowhia’ is the main leg O’Malley stands upon for condemning Gustavus Ferdinand von Tempsky and others. On his advice and approval Hamilton has had statues and street names (eg Tempsky’s) Cancelled. Ref. 2020: Historical Report on Hamilton Street and City Names, AHNZ

5 thoughts on "1864: The Old Man of Rangiaohia"

  1. Taki Kaka says:

    Having studied this event the Anarchists history is quite accurate. There were a number of quotes (referenced) that I hadn’t seen before so thank you.
    The rewriting of NZ history is a travesty, but its a sign of the times.
    As for Dr Vincent O’Malley, well the less said the better, if he used both eyes instead of just one then he would be a far better historian. He is Joanne (Mihinarangi) Forbes’ favourite historian…. funny that..
    The video on Youtube of the unveiling of the propagandised plaque, and the fawning of the Army et al was a beautifully choreographed joke which I’m sure Tom Roa will use in his lectures.
    Great and brave post, good to see the truth coming out on this event.

    1. AHNZ says:

      “The rewriting of NZ history is a travesty, but its a sign of the times.”

      I find that interesting. How many times now have we re-written our history? Every generation? Every saeculum?

      Thank you for your recognition. It’s the fumes I run on.

  2. Stephen Lawrence says:

    Cool story bro. I wonder how the chch thing will be relayed in history? Can’t keep a lid on truth forever. How long are the records from port athur gunner be hidden? I’m sure in 70 years it will become common knowledge, taught at university as an indisputable truth, like ….

    1. AHNZ says:

      Unless it’s of essential utility to the new Consensus then an event like either of those will remain buried.

      Ever hear about the Dunedin Airport Siege of 1979? Nobody else has either.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Like    Comment     Share
Anarchist History of New Zealand: Cultures are not museum pieces. They are the working machinery of everyday life.